These exceptions aside, foreigners
I personally know are all intelligent, professional,
and well-motivated. They are all enjoying
their lives in Japan and enthusiastic about
teaching and helping Japanese students. They
are furthering their knowledge on Japan by
reading books and spending a lot of time
with Japanese colleagues on and off campus.
So, they're loved by their students and have
become an asset or a credit to the university.
When it comes to their status or position,
however, I can't help sympathizing with many
of them, or if I may say, I feel sorry for
them. Many of them have to be content with
their unstable positions on one or two year
employment contract. And they have to worry
about what will happen when the contract
has expired; unluckily the economic situation
is becoming worse and worse nowadays.
Personally I know a lot of foreigners
who have remained for many years in the same
position as an assistant professor or a full-time
instructor, although they are quite efficient
and well qualified. And to make matters worse,
they are not well paid. This is true especially
at private universities.
Contradictory to this, there are too
many highly-paid Japanese teachers who are
unqualified to teach and quite inefficient
in teaching university students. Despite
the fact that they are English teachers, they don't speak English no matter
how often and how sincerely "native"
English speakers propose that they speak
English (on campus, at least) for mutual
understanding. Very often, it is these Japanese
who are eager to form academic cliques and
arrange things behind non-Japanese colleagues'
backs; they don't know how to coordinate
things with the non-Japanese. The only possible
reason these unqusally have ualified Japanese
teachers became full-time professors rather
than get fired is because of the Japanese
system of promotion by seniority and life-time
employment (Quite unfortunately, in Japan
firing people is quite simply not done).
In this respect there are many foreigners
in Japanese universities who're not being
treated fairly and equally. I'd like to say
emphatically that the people who are in university
management should treat Japanese and non-Japanese
teachers impartially. As far as I know, full-time
university teachers, Japanese and non-Japanese,
have to cope with equally heavy teaching
loads. From time to time, non-Japanese teachers
have to take on heavier workloads than Japanese
colleagues, just because they are "native"
English speakers (i.e. Japanese teachers
usually have difficulty checking up on entrance
exam English, for instance).
Being equal
People who own and manage a university
in Japan should treat non-Japanese teachers
as well as they treat Japanese teachers,
or they should bring the free agency system
into their universities as in American universities,
and apply the system to the Japanese and
the non-Japanese equally. Then, really professional
and efficient teachers, Japanese and non-Japanese,
will remain and teach Japanese students (In
this respect, we must head for a shake-up,
a time of change). I'm of the opinion that
many Japanese university owners are "bullying
the weak" and are discriminating against
qualified, efficient teachers from overseas.
This is really bad for Japan and Japan's
future. Japanese universities (and Japan
as a nation) should accept qualified people
from overseas into their center; so far,
only a few of these people have been incorporated
into Japanese universities. Arifin Bey, having
an interview with Bernard Krisher (Japan As We Lived It, Yohan Lotus Books, 1989) says:
They are deceptive. Congenial only
up to a certain extent. They emasculate their
language, for example; allow foreign words
to penetrate. But when it comes to the inner
core of the Japanese value system, you cannot
touch this; it's 'We Japanese.' For example,
at the outer level, they always say, 'Wr
World Peace,' 'We World Community.' When
they're outside their country, they talk
in terms of internationalism. But once they're
back home it's 'We Japanese' again. And this
progresses further in small circles: 'We
Mitsubishi,''We Sumitomo.' And within this
core they have further cores.
Thus, you may be able to penetrate
Japanese society at large, you may get involved,
but you never penetrate into the core. A
foreigner may become an advisor of Mitsubishi,
but not a real official member of Mitsubishi.
They give you high names, even good pay,
but not real involvement or permanence. (pp. 54-5)
This is an undeniable fact, I'm afraid.
In its tue sense of the word, Japanese society
including universities should open its door
widely to the outer world and welcome qualified
and efficient people from overseas to the
center or the core of the society.